Difference between revisions of "Critical analysis: vbw-study "Folgen einer Lieferunterbrechung von russischem Gas für die deutsche Industrie" (June 2022)"

From embargo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
* Our main critique is that the gas gap is calculated as too big, as in Table 5, depicted in the image.
 
* Our main critique is that the gas gap is calculated as too big, as in Table 5, depicted in the image.
** There is an underestimation of imports, which suddenly decrease in April/May
+
** There is an underestimation of imports from the Netherlands, Norway, which suddenly decrease in May/June as opposed to April, contradicting in Table 1 and Abbildung 1. Diese gelieferten Gasmengen werden auf die zusätzlich Gesamengen' werden auf die gelieferten Vorjahresmengen addiert. The 275 TWh from Norway in Table 5
 
** The conversion of electricity is ignored  
 
** The conversion of electricity is ignored  
 
** No energy savings are assumed, whereas energy savings already happen
 
** No energy savings are assumed, whereas energy savings already happen
  
 
<references />
 
<references />

Revision as of 22:05, 28 June 2022

Media coverage of this study:


Our analysis of VBW study [1]:

  • Our main critique is that the gas gap is calculated as too big, as in Table 5, depicted in the image.
    • There is an underestimation of imports from the Netherlands, Norway, which suddenly decrease in May/June as opposed to April, contradicting in Table 1 and Abbildung 1. Diese gelieferten Gasmengen werden auf die zusätzlich Gesamengen' werden auf die gelieferten Vorjahresmengen addiert. The 275 TWh from Norway in Table 5
    • The conversion of electricity is ignored
    • No energy savings are assumed, whereas energy savings already happen
  1. vbw (2022), Konsequenzen eines Importstopps von russischem Erdgas, retrieved 28 June 2022